Name Date Comment
Anonymous 02/13/2023

As an avid trail user I appreciate the trails in the Mac-Dunn. I support the development of more multiuse trails.

Anonymous 09/25/2024

I appreciate the publicly-posted responses to the questions asked at the Community Listening Session, and I have a better understanding now of why Scenario E produces biodiversity modeling results that seem completely illogical. I am wondering if the next round of modeling will separate out the "ecosystems of concern" from the "mature forest reserves", since the two management strategies produce biodiversity results that would seem to cancel each other out when lumped together. It is a design flaw with Scenario E left as it is: a person interested in increasing biodiversity across the entirely of the Mac-Dunn would glance at the current results and decide that Scenario E is a bad choice for the animals that live in this forest. Clearly, that is not the case. Please correct this problem!

Anonymous 01/09/2023

An increase in the diversity and quantity of mountain bike legal trails in the forest is needed. Specifically, I think more advanced trails are needed in the McDonald forest. Also, I'd like to see less clear cutting in forest.

Anonymous 10/31/2022
I don't believe it's an understatement that I have watched dozens of kids and adults lives change for the better through access to OSU's research forests on mountain bikes.
Our Corvallis youth mountain bike team is working hard too introduce our youth to an activity that improves their mental and physical health while collaborating with the community and nature to share this resource.
I recognize this as a privilege and want to thank OSU and other forest users for their continued support of this next generation. I feel that access to this land with emphasis on mutual respect for each other and the resource will continue to promote a vibrant and healthy community
Anonymous 02/13/2023
Thank you for the opportunity to share my comments. I only have three main
ones:
1) building a trail connecting Road 600 (sharp corner) to the top of beautiful hydra (far end closest to road 600) would be grand!
2) there is a rumor going around that the dean of the college of forestry doesn't agree with cleaning after your dog while visiting the forest. Apparently he believes the poop provides some nitrogen to the soil. I'm not a soil scientist, but I wonder if he really understands that the issue is not one or two poops a day. The issue is the number of dogs that visit the forest in just one day. Last I heard that number was around 100+ dogs a day! PLEASE, we need to continue to clean up after our dogs. We spent (I was part of the committee) lots of hours working on the "happy tails on trails" campaign educating people about the importance of cleaning after our dogs ... and yes I was part of the cleaning crew that picked up in just a few hours 80+ pounds of poop at Oak creek gate alone!
3) Re: electric bikes, if research forest is going to allow e-bikes on roads and trails (I prefer just keeping them on roads!) I hope they make a distinction between assisted bikes and motorized ones! I have no issues with assisted bikes. I wrote three comments this morning, Feb 13. I'd like to withdraw comment #2 re: dog poop/cleaning. It was a misunderstanding and a bad rumor. Apologies! Comments #1 and #3 are still good. Thanks!
Anonymous 10/22/2024

Just say no to e-bikes on forest trails! If the average rider is not responsible on the pavement, they certainly aren't going to be responsible on trails. Speed limits won't be observed. Designated areas won't be observed. Pedestrian and animal safety won't be observed. And why bother spend time in the forest if you're just going to zip through at 25 miles an hour?

Anonymous 01/08/2023
Afternoon,
I welcome this opportunity to provide input in an on-line, virtual avenues. Attending some of the listening and in-person sessions has been difficult to schedule around a young family. I wanted to raise a couple suggestions or pointers:
1) The Mac-Dunn forest is an incredible resource for OSU and Corvallis. While it is an OSU 'laboratory', the forests close to town are different and valued by the whole community. It is often overlooked that the Mac-Dunn plays a significant factor for attracting new faculty & students, maintain happy and healthy faculty & students, and retaining existing high performing faculty across the university. As a result, the utilization of the forest, while within the College of Forestry's individual purvey, has trickle on impacts across the university.
2) While mountain bikers are a significant user of the OSU forests around Corvallis, many of us have remained silent due to ever-changing authorizations and associated complexities of our activities and use in the forest. This is to the detriment of CoF, OSU and the Corvallis. Mountain biking has been a significant economic boon for communities across the PNW and a driving force for the economic diversification of many towns like those surrounding OSU in Corvallis.
3) While the Mac-Dunn has a good selection of 'green circle' and basic 'blue square' trails, it lacks purpose built 'black diamond' trails. The development of multiple new advanced' black diamond trails will lessen conflict, and potential injury, with other trail users (hikers, walkers, horse riders) since the riders will be on separate purpose built trails. I would like to advocate strenuously for the development of multiple new advanced/black diamond trails.
4) A note about dual-use/dual direction trails. While at first glance, these trails appear to provide the most 'usability' for every single mile of trail, they have been shown to increase the risk of collision and, unfortunately, conflict between forest and trail users. The development of dedicated 'up only' trails will limit these incidents and minimize conflict. Thank you once again for the opportunity to provide input.
Cheers.
Anonymous 06/05/2024

Reference to “experts” who won’t self-identify is concerning. You see the problem here, yes? Sadly it reminds of the recent past when experts were very clearly apologists for the timber industry, are these the same experts? How would anyone know? You can do better than the department of forestry past. So do better.

Anonymous 02/11/2023

Better partnerships with the community and access to the forest and trails. OSU also needs to engage the community better with how logging is being completed and ultimately reduce the amount of logging.

Anonymous 10/22/2024

Please no e-biles or pedal assisted bikes on the trail

Anonymous 01/08/2023

more diverse trails for a wider range of skill levels, more trail connectivity (would help ease parking issues at overcrowded trailheads too!). possibly some user specific trails and/or directional trails to ease conflicts. there is a small army of volunteers waiting in the wings if properly inspired. thanks!

Anonymous 06/05/2024

All of the questions about experts make me realize that ultimately this is a question of ethics - a question about how we ought to manage or steward the forest. You have a lot of people who are experts at describing things, but do you have any ethics experts. Maybe not. But why not? If so, why don't we hear from or include those experts.

Anonymous 10/30/2022
While I am genuinely pleased to see so many comments from OSU College of Forestry alumni, I am disappointed that none of them -- not one -- advocates for anything other than continuing the same harvests and intensive management practices. Currently, 97% of the Mac-Dunn is under some form of "active forest management". Three percent remains in mature/old growth reserves. THREE PERCENT. Given the myriad known benefits and ecosystem services uncut forest provides, that is an absurd imbalance.
It does not speak well of OSU that graduates of its world-class College of Forestry don't seem to find any other values in a forest besides MBF. I would have expected somebody to advocate for other aspects of being a forester besides resource extraction. The school has failed if none of its graduates see the need for a broader concept of management, one that includes larger forest reserves within the McDonald-Dunn.
Anonymous 02/11/2023

Would like more parking at Oak Creek. Is there any chance of getting a trail from Rd 670 to Dimple, or is that protected for some reason? Is there any chance of getting the old South Ridge trail segment between Rd 770 and the bottom of South Side Slip restored?

Anonymous 10/16/2024

-I really don't think motorcycles (aka electric motor bikes) should be allowed in the forest.
-I don't see the harm in unauthorized trails, as long as they are not in active research areas. When compared to the aftermath of any logging operation, not to mention a clear cut, it is hard to see how an argument can be made that the thin line of dirt damages the forest resource.
-Instead of wasteful and risky burning of slash piles, why not issue user permits a few days a year to allow the local community to take the slash waste and use it for heating homes???
-Finally, parking at Oak Creek should be expanded. This is the best place to access the sanctioned MTB trails. At other trail heads, the best "use" trails have been systematically obliterated. 

Anonymous 01/06/2023

Communication of plans, maps, trails, and conditions of trails would be a huge help.

Anonymous 06/04/2024

"If it is not being done already, I would suggest that the trail development coordinator and the logging boss communicate closely re: anticipated logging and minimizing effects on trails. For instance, the bonzai bypass that goes to the foot of the former bonzai route went in 2-3 years ago...beautiful, shaded area...saw a cougar there once, and Pacific Wrens were numerous. It is now an open dirt trail through logging slash. If I was a trail volunteer and I knew that would happen, I would not waste my time and effort. Similar thing happened on the Bombs Away connector between Ridge Trail. Peavy peak trails have been written up in Salem and Eugene as destination trails.
That area was trashed, and opened some 6-8 wks later thru volunteer effort. The other thing communication will help is to NOT build a trail prior to logging planned in the near future. I would like to see some environmental impact statements out of other OSU departments, not as defenses but as factual assistance. The recent logging is certainly not a model to learn from; also students will need to deal with folks who care about the forest and who can explain what is happening, what we know about wildlife there and how we are mitigating logging effects. The temptation to take pictures and submit to people who rate schools is strong. "

Anonymous 10/25/2022

I have lived out in Soap Creek Valley for almost 35 years. There is a lot more traffic and people visiting OSU at all entrances into the forest in the past five. Since OSU is encouraging people to recreate at these different areas I would hope they would provide more doggie bags for all the dog walkers. I feel there should be a dispenser at every gate and trailhead.

Anonymous 02/10/2023

As someone who utilized the trails 6 days a week, it would be amazing to see more technical trails put in for the community to use. We have a great trail network already and it would be great to continue to build upon it.

Anonymous 10/22/2024

Re: recreational matters, no e-bikes and no dogs should be allowed in the Mac-Dunn Research Forests.

Anonymous 01/05/2023

Access to this forest has been and remains very valuable to my physical and mental health. I hope that the stewards of this forest will expand recreational use to include sanctioning more difficult trails for both mountain bikes and trail runners while maintaining trail options for hikers. The value of sanctioning more difficult trails is added trail builder engagement, user enjoyment, and trail maintenance. Although the forest was originally designated for research purposes I believe public lands should be accessible to citizens as well as academics. With cooperative recreation development the research needs can be met while providing expanded access to city residents.

Anonymous 06/04/2024

As a Benton County resident, I am stunned - quite frankly - at OSU's recent history of McDonald Dunn forest management practices, i.e., clear cut logging of old-growth and mature trees in the name of financial profit. During a time of incredibly destructive climate change, every single person and entity must do everything possible to mitigate damage already done, and take every measure to protect our fragile future. Every single person relies on more than 20,000 breaths of air; approximately 8 glasses of clean drinkable water; and 3 plates of healthy food every single day - all of which are made possible by healthy diverse forests. We all benefit greatly from free-of-charge ecosystem services provided by healthy diverse forests. Our very existence is also compromised by prioritizing financial profit over forest health and integrity. OSU's management plan must place a high priority on supporting any and all strategic actions leading to a diverse forest representative of Pacific NW native tree and plant species. Management priorities must also include careful management of fragile stream embankments to prevent erosion and the spread of noxious weeds and non-native species. OSU's management plan must also create habitat conditions that provide for a diverse population of native insect, bird, amphibian, mammal and other wildlife species once found in the McDonald Dunn Forest. We - as a community - owe it to ourselves and our forest inhabitants the chance to calm climate change and support a healthy way of life by protecting lands, waters and wildlife. I'm asking OSU to create and strategically manage the McDonald Dunn Forest for conservation purposes only.

Anonymous 10/24/2022
I have concerns about the effectiveness of the community listening sessions as currently structured. I understand and appreciate the desire to provide multiple venues for participation. But having some folks in a room together, and other people conducting a different session on Zoom, and a third party synthesizing all of the comments and providing them in a list of bullet points to the committee members strikes me as a perfect recipe for poor communication. If the CoF is genuinely interested in hearing feedback from the community, I would recommend:
* requiring all members of BOTH committees to be present (there to listen, not speak)
* choosing a single format (in person OR zoom) and keeping all participants together
Basically, the public should be able to address the people creating the forest plan directly, and this doesn't seem that hard to achieve.
(Also, the recordings of previous zoom meetings have been plagued with technical difficulties, making hearing what is being said and who is speaking nearly impossible to discern. I trust those issues will be fixed for the upcoming Faculty Planning Committee meeting...)
Thank you!
Anonymous 02/10/2023

More trails in the Dunn forest please!

Anonymous 10/18/2024

I live on Oak Creek Drive not far from the gate. Currently, the traffic is along the lines of that expected of a 30- dwelling housing development on a daily basis, more on nice weekends.
There are no shoulders on much of the road beyond the junction with Cardwell Hill. The sight lines are poor, especially near our driveway. We understand that recreation is an important use, but we also find it is nearly impossible to safely walk or bicycle on our road on weekends and late afternoons when traffic is heavy. *This is our neighborhood.* Although most forest users are considerate, even 20 mph feels very fast if a car passes you so closely you could reach out and touch it. That's not uncommon because the road is so narrow and there is no way to step off the pavement in many areas. We urge the college to carefully consider how more access can be created across a variety of trailheads to prevent any one neighborhood from having to bear the brunt of the negative effects of the increased traffic, which is a major safety issue as well as a significant livability issue (the traffic noise can be considerable, we never encounter our neighbors anymore, and I've peeled dozens of dead wild animals off the pavement over the past decade). I'm not interested in becoming literal road kill for other peoples' enjoyment, but I also expect to be able to safely walk my dogs near my home or use my bicycle for transportation to town (which it is, on a daily basis).